Ship repair done in a shipyard · Mississippi

Wepfer Marine of Greenville

Greenville, MS · ~24 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wepfer Marine of Greenville runs at 160% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Ship repair done in a shipyard workplace, earning a grade D.

Wepfer Marine of Greenville: 5.3 TCR = 160% of Ship repair done in a shipyard BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wepfer Marine of Greenville safety composite

Wepfer Marine of Greenville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

Wepfer Marine of Greenville injury rate improved

Wepfer Marine of Greenville's TCR fell 0.4 from 6.4 in 2016 to 6.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.4 · 2017=9.6 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=6.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=6.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336611 · Greenville, MS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 160% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #15/19
  • PHOTO Iron River Plant
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Iron River Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Wepfer Marine of Greenville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wepfer Marine of Greenville averages 5.3 TCR (160% of the Ship repair done in a shipyard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wepfer Marine of Greenville TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2017=9.6 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=6.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=6 · BLS 3.3

Where Wepfer Marine of Greenville falls in its industry

454 Ship repair done in a shipyard establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 19 Ship repair done in a shipyard employers in Mississippi.

Wepfer Marine of Greenville (24 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Wepfer Marine of Greenville
Wepfer Marine of Greenville (24 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Wepfer Marine of Greenville has fewer employees than the Ship repair done in a shipyard median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.0 6.0 2 0 0
2023 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.3 3.2 2 0 0
2020 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2019 8.4 2.8 3 0 0
2018 5.1 0.0 2 0 0
2017 9.6 9.6 3 0 0
2016 6.4 3.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336611 · MS · Greenville

454 Ship repair done in a shipyard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 52 employers in Greenville, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Iron River Plant 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shipyard Construction 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trident - Seattle 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Conrad Morgan City Shipyard 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Laurel Office MPC3301 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paramount Construction Group, LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nicholas Acoustics & Specialty Company, Inc. 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE L&T Construction, Inc 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR 182 353 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 182 346 FTE
CITY-NEAR USG Interiors Greenville 210 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tropicana Casino Greenville 186 FTE
NAT-TCR Clark Mechanical Services Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pataskala 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Waubonsee Development 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Greens 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sturgis 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Akin Brothers Flooring LLC 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE 102430-Okc-Main Store 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leland NC 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.