Water treatment and distribution · Tennessee

West Warren-Viola Utility District

Morrison, TN · ~24 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

West Warren-Viola Utility District runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Water treatment and distribution workplace, earning a grade D.

West Warren-Viola Utility District: 1.7 TCR = 143% of Water treatment and distribution BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

West Warren-Viola Utility District safety composite

West Warren-Viola Utility District scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

West Warren-Viola Utility District: 3.8 → 4.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

West Warren-Viola Utility District's TCR rose 0.4 from 3.8 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Morrison, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.7 · 143% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/15
  • PHOTO 035 ARDEN-CORDOVA-WC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 035 ARDEN-CORDOVA-WC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

West Warren-Viola Utility District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows West Warren-Viola Utility District averages 1.7 TCR (143% of the Water treatment and distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

West Warren-Viola Utility District TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=0 · 2019=4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 1.2

Where West Warren-Viola Utility District falls in its industry

727 Water treatment and distributi establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 15 Water treatment and distributi employers in Tennessee.

West Warren-Viola Utility District (24 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate West Warren-Viola Utility District
West Warren-Viola Utility District (24 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

West Warren-Viola Utility District has fewer employees than the Water treatment and distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 0.0 0 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.8 3.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · TN · Morrison

727 Water treatment and distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 8 employers in Morrison, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 035 ARDEN-CORDOVA-WC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jordanelle Special Service District 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pittsburgh Operations - Mt. Oliver Meter Shop 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quadvest LP 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE RIVERSIDE FUQUA FARMS LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buy Sod USA - Nashville Sod Farm 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE JOB 268BG Rutherford County 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE C.K. Masonry Co., Inc 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Warren County (BAMG) 1,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morrison Industries 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Porter Roofing Contractors Morrison, TN 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOR 57 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Helena School S.D. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Composites One LLC - Santa Fe Springs 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR PnP Modesto 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR McAllen TX Yard 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Thomas Concrete of Georgia Suwanee 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sitework Developing Inc 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Delta Sky Club Ewr 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE S05436 - WM Mercer County Transfer 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.