Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · North Carolina

Western

Asheville, NC · ~224 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Western runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Western: 0.7 TCR = 19% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Western safety composite

Western scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Western held a steady TCR band

Western's TCR held near 0.3 from 1.2 in 2020 to 0.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=1.2 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Asheville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #3/30
  • PHOTO Reach for Resources,…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~224 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Reach for Resources, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Western in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Western averages 0.7 TCR (19% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Western TCR series: 2020=1.2 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Western falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 30 Activity centers for disabled employers in North Carolina.

Western (224 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Western
Western (224 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Western has more employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2020 1.2 1.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · NC · Asheville

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 290 employers in Asheville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Reach for Resources, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morning View Care Center Community Services 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yu-Ai Kai Japanese American Community Senior Service 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Virginia's Choice, Inc - Elkins 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Polymer Group, INC 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ennis-Flint Thomasville 111-115 Campus 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berry Global Films - Matthews, NC 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charlotte Steel Mill 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Hospital; MH Hospital Manager, LLC 8,097 FTE
CITY-NEAR Biltmore Workforce Management 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Medical Associates 1,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Care Partners 1,018 FTE
NAT-TCR Tri State Supply (PC8688) 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cubic Corporation 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Fillmore Construction LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Waste-Away Group Ltd. 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Repligen Corporation, Marlborough 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phoenix Fabricators and Erectors 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE RW Screw LLC 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE M Health Clinics/Surgery Ctr 224 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.