Continuing care retirement communities · Virginia

Westminster-Canterbury on Chesapeake Bay

Virginia Beach, VA · ~636 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Westminster-Canterbury on Chesapeake Bay runs at 182% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

Westminster-Canterbury on Chesapeake Bay: 6.9 TCR = 182% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Westminster-Canterbury on Chesapeake Bay safety composite

Westminster-Canterbury on Chesapeake Bay scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2016→2020

Westminster-Canterbury on Chesapeake Bay injury rate improved

Westminster-Canterbury on Chesapeake Bay's TCR fell 4.8 from 8.7 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.7 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Virginia Beach, VA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.9 · 182% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #47/91
  • PHOTO Arbor Terrace Citrus…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 161 inj
  • SIZE ~636 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arbor Terrace Citrus Park IL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Westminster-Canterbury on Chesapeake Bay in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Westminster-Canterbury on Chesapeake Bay averages 6.9 TCR (182% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Westminster-Canterbury on Chesapeake Bay TCR series: 2016=8.7 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=3.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Westminster-Canterbury on Chesapeake Bay falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 91 Continuing care retirement com employers in Virginia.

Westminster-Canterbury on Chesapeake Bay (636 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Westminster-Canterbury on Chesapeake Bay
Westminster-Canterbury on Chesapeake Bay (636 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Westminster-Canterbury on Chesapeake Bay has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.9 2.8 18 3 0
2019 8.2 5.3 40 0 0
2018 8.3 5.5 36 0 0
2017 5.5 4.3 27 0 0
2016 8.7 6.5 40 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · VA · Virginia Beach

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 486 employers in Virginia Beach, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arbor Terrace Citrus Park IL 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Somerby of Peachtree City 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fellowship Square - Surprise 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Lutheran Village at Miller's Grant 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE CALIBRE Systems Inc 636 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elbit Systems of America - Night Vision LLC 637 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schools Department of Student Transportation 635 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Boston, DC 635 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Virginia Beach 8,144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Main Office - 01 7,774 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hii - Technical Solutions Division 4,475 FTE
CITY-NEAR STIHL Inc. 2,399 FTE
NAT-TCR 118 - Mesa Branch - Rsg 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cannon North 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Midwest Research Swine, LLC 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1166 - North Plainfield Nj Whse 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Chino 636 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amzl : Dch2 636 FTE
NAT-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDT1 636 FTE
NAT-SIZE GA 2605 Circle 75 Pkwy SE 636 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.