Commercial Construction · Alabama

Whaley Construction

Troy, AL · ~59 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Whaley Construction runs at 221% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Commercial Construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Whaley Construction: 6.4 TCR = 221% of Commercial Construction BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Whaley Construction safety composite

Whaley Construction scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.1

2017→2024

Whaley Construction injury rate improved

Whaley Construction's TCR fell 8.1 from 10.9 in 2017 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.9 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=11.2 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Troy, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.4 · 221% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #60/64
  • PHOTO Brester Construction…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brester Construction, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Whaley Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Whaley Construction averages 6.4 TCR (221% of the Commercial Construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Whaley Construction TCR series: 2017=10.9 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=11.2 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 2.9

Where Whaley Construction falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial Construction establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 64 Commercial Construction employers in Alabama.

Whaley Construction (59 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Whaley Construction
Whaley Construction (59 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Whaley Construction has more employees than the Commercial Construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 0.0 2 0 0
2023 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2022 4.4 4.4 3 0 0
2021 6.4 4.8 4 0 0
2020 6.4 3.2 4 0 0
2019 11.2 6.4 7 0 0
2018 6.7 5.0 4 0 0
2017 10.9 0.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · AL · Troy

4,692 Commercial Construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 52 employers in Troy, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brester Construction, Inc. 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DEW Construction - Manchester Office 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DEW Construction Corp 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Modern Building Systems 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE COTTAGE HILL NURSERY, INC. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marshall Dekalb Electric Coop 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Birmingham Division Varnons Crew Headquarters 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Commercial Construction & Maintenance, Inc. 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Troy Campus (1046) 551 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US AL Troy 299 Airport Blvd (5209) 483 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sanders Lead Company, Inc. 478 FTE
CITY-NEAR Troy 390 FTE
NAT-TCR Final Grade Inc 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR MTS Lansing 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR S04045 - WM of Dallas 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bar Processing Corporation 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1892 Grand Prairie 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schonwetter Enterprises, Inc d/b/a Bilinski's Sausage Mfg Co 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avnet Orlando US28X 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ag Processing Inc 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.