Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · New Jersey

Whippany Actuation Systems

Whippany, NJ · ~152 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Whippany Actuation Systems runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Whippany Actuation Systems: 3.0 TCR = 90% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Whippany Actuation Systems safety composite

Whippany Actuation Systems scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2017→2024

Whippany Actuation Systems injury rate improved

Whippany Actuation Systems's TCR fell 0.4 from 1.8 in 2017 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.8 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Whippany, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 90% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P29
  • PHOTO Composites Horizons,…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~152 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Composites Horizons, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Whippany Actuation Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Whippany Actuation Systems averages 3.0 TCR (90% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Whippany Actuation Systems TCR series: 2017=1.8 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Whippany Actuation Systems falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Whippany Actuation Systems (152 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Whippany Actuation Systems
Whippany Actuation Systems (152 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Whippany Actuation Systems has more employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 0.0 2 0 0
2023 2.9 0.7 2 2 0
2022 5.9 5.3 5 4 0
2021 2.1 2.1 3 0 0
2020 2.9 2.9 3 1 0
2019 3.1 2.5 5 0 0
2018 3.7 3.1 6 0 0
2017 1.8 1.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · NJ · Whippany

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 28 employers in Whippany, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Composites Horizons, LLC 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR McCauley Propeller 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stretch Forming Corporation 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR BE Aerospace - Lenexa 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vericon Construction Company LLC 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE DFA-CDL-BRIDGETON NJ-PLANT 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Domino's Supply Chain Center- New Jersey 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Universal Forest Products 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nutra-Med Packaging LLC - 118 Algonquin Parkway 750 FTE
CITY-NEAR Star-Lo Electric Inc. 328 FTE
CITY-NEAR HQ Whippany NJ 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR Halo Pharmaceutical, Inc. d/b/a Cambrex Whippany 247 FTE
NAT-TCR Substitutes 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR KHS&S Contractors - Washington 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Star of the West Milling Company, Charlotte, Mi. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR American Atelier Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Benton PUD 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Porter Corp 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE 483020-East Penn | PA | KBS-825 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baker Hughes 152 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.