Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · California

Stretch Forming Corporation

Perris, CA · ~80 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stretch Forming Corporation runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Stretch Forming Corporation: 3.0 TCR = 91% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stretch Forming Corporation safety composite

Stretch Forming Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Stretch Forming Corporation: 3.8 → 6.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.75× in 2024

Stretch Forming Corporation's TCR rose 2.3 from 3.8 in 2016 to 6.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Perris, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 91% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #61/104
  • PHOTO BE Aerospace - Lenexa
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BE Aerospace - Lenexa (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Stretch Forming Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stretch Forming Corporation averages 3.0 TCR (91% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stretch Forming Corporation TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=4.5 · 2019=2.9 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=6.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Stretch Forming Corporation falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 104 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in California.

Stretch Forming Corporation (80 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Stretch Forming Corporation
Stretch Forming Corporation (80 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Stretch Forming Corporation has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.1 5.2 7 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 5 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.6 1.2 3 0 0
2019 2.9 2.9 3 0 0
2017 4.5 4.5 5 0 0
2016 3.8 1.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · CA · Perris

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 130 employers in Perris, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BE Aerospace - Lenexa 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Whippany Actuation Systems 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Composites Horizons, LLC 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR McCauley Propeller 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE JJJ HARVESTING 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE T&A - Huron - Farm 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacifc International Marketing 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilgenburg Greenhouses 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR South West Distribution Center SWDC 1,419 FTE
CITY-NEAR South West Distribution Center - SWDC 1,340 FTE
CITY-NEAR SOUTHERN REGION : RRU 1,332 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-015 911 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Mary Washington University Cen 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Western New Mexico University 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Wiley Hicks Jr Inc 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Star Excavating 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Location 1 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Byrnes Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cottondale 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oakmont 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.