Concrete pouring · California

Whiteside Construction Corporation

Richmond, CA · ~22 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Whiteside Construction Corporation runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Concrete pouring workplace, earning a grade A.

Whiteside Construction Corporation: 0.4 TCR = 15% of Concrete pouring BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Whiteside Construction Corporation safety composite

Whiteside Construction Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2018→2024

Whiteside Construction Corporation injury rate improved

Whiteside Construction Corporation's TCR fell 2.6 from 2.6 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Richmond, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/166
  • PHOTO VMG Construction Inc
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: VMG Construction Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Whiteside Construction Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Whiteside Construction Corporation averages 0.4 TCR (15% of the Concrete pouring BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Whiteside Construction Corporation TCR series: 2018=2.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Whiteside Construction Corporation falls in its industry

1,314 Concrete pouring establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 166 Concrete pouring employers in California.

Whiteside Construction Corporation (22 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Whiteside Construction Corporation
Whiteside Construction Corporation (22 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Whiteside Construction Corporation has fewer employees than the Concrete pouring median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · CA · Richmond

1,314 Concrete pouring employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 158 employers in Richmond, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR VMG Construction Inc 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR M.C. Velar Construction Corp. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Contech Services Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chestatee Industrial Contractor, LLC 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE LaGrande Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Del Carlo Farms, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linda Vista Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOUNTAIN VIEW FARM SHOP 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 134 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 635 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 147 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 105 2,724 FTE
NAT-TCR Milliken Pendleton Plant 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR NA Mfg Dearborn 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR QSI Athens Db 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mobile Branch 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shreveport Facility 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corner Pantry #30 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barrick Staker Enterprise LLC 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hampton Inn & Suites 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.