Continuing care retirement communities · North Carolina

WhiteStone: A Masonic and Eastern Star Community

Greensboro, NC · ~255 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

WhiteStone: A Masonic and Eastern Star Community runs at 157% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

WhiteStone: A Masonic and Eastern Star Community: 6.0 TCR = 157% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

WhiteStone: A Masonic and Eastern Star Community safety composite

WhiteStone: A Masonic and Eastern Star Community scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

WhiteStone: A Masonic and Eastern Star Community: 5.3 → 6.7 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 6.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.93× in 2017

WhiteStone: A Masonic and Eastern Star Community's TCR rose 1.4 from 5.3 in 2016 to 6.7 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Greensboro, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 157% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #58/105
  • PHOTO Barton Creek Senior …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~255 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Barton Creek Senior Living Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

WhiteStone: A Masonic and Eastern Star Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows WhiteStone: A Masonic and Eastern Star Community averages 6.0 TCR (157% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

WhiteStone: A Masonic and Eastern Star Community TCR series: 2016=5.3 · 2017=6.7 · BLS 3.8

Where WhiteStone: A Masonic and Eastern Star Community falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #58 safest of 105 Continuing care retirement com employers in North Carolina.

WhiteStone: A Masonic and Eastern Star Community (255 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate WhiteStone: A Masonic and Eastern Star Community
WhiteStone: A Masonic and Eastern Star Community (255 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

WhiteStone: A Masonic and Eastern Star Community has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 6.7 5.5 12 0 0
2016 5.3 3.5 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NC · Greensboro

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Barton Creek Senior Living Inc 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR THE VILLAGE AT LIFEQUEST 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PremierLife Corporation 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morningside Ministries 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanford Contractors, Inc. 255 FTE
STATE-SIZE Griffin Masonry 255 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coastal AgroBusiness, Inc. 255 FTE
STATE-SIZE GoRaleigh 255 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR Mercedes Facility 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Home Health 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hospital 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0024 0011 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lincoln Site 255 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holland - CI 255 FTE
NAT-SIZE SYRCNYAN 255 FTE
NAT-SIZE SNANTXCADS3 255 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.