Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance · Kansas

Wichita Fleet

Wichita, KS · ~27 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wichita Fleet runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance workplace, earning a grade A.

Wichita Fleet: 1.7 TCR = 38% of Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wichita Fleet safety composite

Wichita Fleet scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Wichita Fleet held a steady TCR band

Wichita Fleet's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=7.0 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484230 · Wichita, KS AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.7 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/20
  • PHOTO LSP Transport
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LSP Transport (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Wichita Fleet in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wichita Fleet averages 1.7 TCR (38% of the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wichita Fleet TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=7 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Wichita Fleet falls in its industry

1,026 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 20 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica employers in Kansas.

Wichita Fleet (27 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Wichita Fleet
Wichita Fleet (27 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Wichita Fleet has fewer employees than the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 7.0 7.0 2 0 0
2021 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484230 · KS · Wichita

1,026 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 841 employers in Wichita, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LSP Transport 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ergon Trucking, Inc. - Petal 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR TMC Transportation - Frostproof Lowes DC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transport Service 60324 TSC Freeport 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Turon Feed Yard 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE NA Timmerman - Colby 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tecumseh Energy Center 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE GREAT BEND SC 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spirit Aerosystems 11,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR Textron Aviation - Mid Continent 4,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wesley Medical Center 2,657 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-KSWIC062 2,438 FTE
NAT-TCR H.L. Chapman Pipeline Construction , Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ocean Spray Middleboro Processing Facility 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Clearwater 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR ALTAVISTA 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Elkhorn Operating Building 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Progressive Electric, Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nu Way Concrete Forms Southeast, LLC 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hampton South Plainfield 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.