Trenching (except underwater) · Texas

H.L. Chapman Pipeline Construction , Inc.

Leander, TX · ~226 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

H.L. Chapman Pipeline Construction , Inc. runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Trenching (except underwater) workplace, earning a grade B.

H.L. Chapman Pipeline Construction , Inc.: 1.7 TCR = 61% of Trenching (except underwater) BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

H.L. Chapman Pipeline Construction , Inc. safety composite

H.L. Chapman Pipeline Construction , Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

H.L. Chapman Pipeline Construction , Inc.: 1.4 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 2.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.64× in 2024

H.L. Chapman Pipeline Construction , Inc.'s TCR rose 0.5 from 1.4 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · Leander, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 61% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #81/147
  • PHOTO Clark and Sons Contr…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~226 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clark and Sons Contracting Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

H.L. Chapman Pipeline Construction , Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows H.L. Chapman Pipeline Construction , Inc. averages 1.7 TCR (61% of the Trenching (except underwater) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

H.L. Chapman Pipeline Construction , Inc. TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=2 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 2.8

Where H.L. Chapman Pipeline Construction , Inc. falls in its industry

1,750 Trenching (except underwater) establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 147 Trenching (except underwater) employers in Texas.

H.L. Chapman Pipeline Construction , Inc. (226 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate H.L. Chapman Pipeline Construction , Inc.
H.L. Chapman Pipeline Construction , Inc. (226 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

H.L. Chapman Pipeline Construction , Inc. has more employees than the Trenching (except underwater) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.1 7 0 0
2023 0.9 0.0 3 0 0
2022 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2021 1.7 0.8 4 0 0
2020 2.2 1.1 6 0 0
2019 1.9 0.6 7 0 0
2018 2.0 2.0 6 0 0
2017 2.5 2.1 6 0 0
2016 1.4 1.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · TX · Leander

1,750 Trenching (except underwater) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 33 employers in Leander, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clark and Sons Contracting Corporation 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Green City Demolition 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richmond, VA Office 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Laurita, Inc. 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vinculums Services LLC 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE VENTURE SOLUTIONS INC - 0093C 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seatrax, Inc 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE KW International, LLC 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Liberty Civil Construction,LLC 345 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2774 LOWE S OF LEANDER TX 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2807-2774 190 FTE
CITY-NEAR Firefly Aerospace Hive 137 FTE
NAT-TCR Ocean Spray Middleboro Processing Facility 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Wichita Fleet 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Clearwater 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR ALTAVISTA 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Appleton 22 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE Country Meadows of Bethlehem 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE GATX Waycross Georgia 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE Absopure Company #14 226 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.