Correctional institutions · Connecticut

Willard-Cybulski Correctional Institution

Enfield, CT · ~232 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Willard-Cybulski Correctional Institution runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Correctional institutions workplace, earning a grade C.

Willard-Cybulski Correctional Institution: 3.3 TCR = 103% of Correctional institutions BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Willard-Cybulski Correctional Institution safety composite

Willard-Cybulski Correctional Institution scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Willard-Cybulski Correctional Institution: 2.6 → 7.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.3 TCR · DART/TCR 2.22× in 2024

Willard-Cybulski Correctional Institution's TCR rose 4.7 from 2.6 in 2017 to 7.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922140 · Enfield, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 103% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #4/19
  • PHOTO Virginia Correctiona…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~232 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Virginia Correctional Center for Women (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Willard-Cybulski Correctional Institution in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Willard-Cybulski Correctional Institution averages 3.3 TCR (103% of the Correctional institutions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Willard-Cybulski Correctional Institution TCR series: 2017=2.6 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=7.3 · BLS 3.2

Where Willard-Cybulski Correctional Institution falls in its industry

482 Correctional institutions establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 19 Correctional institutions employers in Connecticut.

Willard-Cybulski Correctional Institution (232 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Willard-Cybulski Correctional Institution
Willard-Cybulski Correctional Institution (232 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Willard-Cybulski Correctional Institution has fewer employees than the Correctional institutions median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.3 7.3 11 1 0
2023 3.8 3.8 7 0 0
2022 6.2 6.2 13 0 0
2021 0.9 0.9 2 0 0
2020 1.8 1.8 3 1 0
2019 2.2 1.8 4 1 0
2018 1.4 1.4 2 1 0
2017 2.6 2.1 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922140 · CT · Enfield

482 Correctional institutions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 106 employers in Enfield, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Virginia Correctional Center for Women 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR FCI Safford 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR State Farm Correctional Center 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR RED ROCK CORRECTIONAL CENTER 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Aptar Stratford 232 FTE
STATE-SIZE 101 232 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woodlake At Tolland 232 FTE
STATE-SIZE S&S Worldwide 231 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC 41 - Hartford 464 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eppendorf Manufacturing Corporation 442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advance Auto Parts DC 41 419 FTE
CITY-NEAR 12131 346 FTE
NAT-TCR Midland Truss, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR M-C Fabrication, Inc 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Shasta Beverages Inc Baltimore 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR FABco LLC Humble 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Whittier Pacific Care Center 232 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Spring Refinery 232 FTE
NAT-SIZE ESCO Construction Co 232 FTE
NAT-SIZE Apostolic Christian Restmor 232 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.