Highway construction · Texas

Williams Brothers Construction Company Inc.

Houston, TX · ~1,915 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Williams Brothers Construction Company Inc. runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Highway construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Williams Brothers Construction Company Inc.: 2.1 TCR = 75% of Highway construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Williams Brothers Construction Company Inc. safety composite

Williams Brothers Construction Company Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Williams Brothers Construction Company Inc.: 1.7 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 2.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.78× in 2021

Williams Brothers Construction Company Inc.'s TCR rose 0.8 from 1.7 in 2020 to 2.5 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 75% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #143/286
  • PHOTO Evans Construction
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 101 inj
  • SIZE ~1,915 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Evans Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Williams Brothers Construction Company Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Williams Brothers Construction Company Inc. averages 2.1 TCR (75% of the Highway construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Williams Brothers Construction Company Inc. TCR series: 2020=1.7 · 2021=2.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Williams Brothers Construction Company Inc. falls in its industry

4,078 Highway construction establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #143 safest of 286 Highway construction employers in Texas.

Williams Brothers Construction Company Inc. (1,915 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Williams Brothers Construction Company Inc.
Williams Brothers Construction Company Inc. (1,915 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Williams Brothers Construction Company Inc. has more employees than the Highway construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.5 1.6 53 5 0
2020 1.7 1.1 48 1 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · TX · Houston

4,078 Highway construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Evans Construction 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schwarz Paving Company Inc 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pro 2 Pave, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Civil Constructors West Coast, LLC 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE SRO-SOUTHERN RESERVATIONS OFFICE 1,918 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clear Lake Regional Medical Center 1,918 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Beach Street (5411) 1,919 FTE
STATE-SIZE Houston Methodist Baytown Hospital 1,920 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Sub-Zero Built-In 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR American Weldquip LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sutter East Bay Medical Foundation (227-252) 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR DPAM-LB 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Anmed Health Medical Center 1,914 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cerritos Hub (Cacer) 1,916 FTE
NAT-SIZE University of Maryland St. Joseph Medical Center 1,916 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hormel Foods - Austin 1,914 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.