Scheduled Air Transportation · Texas

Sro-Southern Reservations Office

Fort Worth, TX · ~1,918 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sro-Southern Reservations Office runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Scheduled Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade A.

Sro-Southern Reservations Office: 2.0 TCR = 44% of Scheduled Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sro-Southern Reservations Office safety composite

Sro-Southern Reservations Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sro-Southern Reservations Office held a steady TCR band

Sro-Southern Reservations Office's TCR held near 0.2 from 2.1 in 2017 to 1.9 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.1 · 2018=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Fort Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 2.0 · 44% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #27/146
  • PHOTO LAX - Flight Ops
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~1,918 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LAX - Flight Ops (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Sro-Southern Reservations Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sro-Southern Reservations Office averages 2.0 TCR (44% of the Scheduled Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sro-Southern Reservations Office TCR series: 2017=2.1 · 2018=1.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Sro-Southern Reservations Office falls in its industry

1,568 Scheduled Air Transportation establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 146 Scheduled Air Transportation employers in Texas.

Sro-Southern Reservations Office (1,918 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Sro-Southern Reservations Office
Sro-Southern Reservations Office (1,918 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Sro-Southern Reservations Office has more employees than the Scheduled Air Transportation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.9 1.4 21 5 0
2017 2.1 1.0 27 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · TX · Fort Worth

1,568 Scheduled Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LAX - Flight Ops 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR RAI MX ORD 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spirit Airlines - IAH 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9095-LAS 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Clear Lake Regional Medical Center 1,918 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Beach Street (5411) 1,919 FTE
STATE-SIZE Houston Methodist Baytown Hospital 1,920 FTE
STATE-SIZE Williams Brothers Construction Company Inc. 1,915 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Gallatin Sheet Plant 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Westin Michigan Avenue 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Essity Professional Hygiene 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ortho Clinical Diagnositcs - Building 642 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Monmouth Medical Center 1,918 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6354-FL20 1,917 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fuyao Glass America 1,917 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rolls-Royce: Merdian Center 1,919 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.