Sprinkler systems, automatic fire, manufacturing · Texas

Williams Fire & Hazard Control

Port Arthur, TX · ~53 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Williams Fire & Hazard Control runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Sprinkler systems, automatic fire, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Williams Fire & Hazard Control: 0.4 TCR = 12% of Sprinkler systems, automatic fire, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Williams Fire & Hazard Control safety composite

Williams Fire & Hazard Control scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2016→2024

Williams Fire & Hazard Control injury rate improved

Williams Fire & Hazard Control's TCR fell 1.8 from 1.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.8 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333999 · Port Arthur, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/14
  • PHOTO ATS Ohio, Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ATS Ohio, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Williams Fire & Hazard Control in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Williams Fire & Hazard Control averages 0.4 TCR (12% of the Sprinkler systems, automatic fire, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Williams Fire & Hazard Control TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Williams Fire & Hazard Control falls in its industry

242 Sprinkler systems, automatic f establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 14 Sprinkler systems, automatic f employers in Texas.

Williams Fire & Hazard Control (53 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Williams Fire & Hazard Control
Williams Fire & Hazard Control (53 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Williams Fire & Hazard Control has fewer employees than the Sprinkler systems, automatic fire, manuf median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2016 1.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333999 · TX · Port Arthur

242 Sprinkler systems, automatic fire, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 122 employers in Port Arthur, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ATS Ohio, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Atomics - Rancho Bernardo - G75 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Filtration : Oxnard 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Atomics - Rancho Bernardo - G92 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE XIT Feeders 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolf Creek Feedyard 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Cattle Feeders, LLC 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glasscock County Coop 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Motiva Enterprises LLC 1,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR Port Arthur Liquefaction Project 1,428 FTE
CITY-NEAR Echo Maintenance LLC 937 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Premcor Refining Group INC 773 FTE
NAT-TCR Kamadulski Excavating and Grading 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cinder, LLC 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Genesis Energy,Scenic Station 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Eastman Chemical Kingsport 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Vancouver Stonebridge 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE RBC Plymouth 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Braham Area High School 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Montrose Health Center LLC 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.