Dies, steel rule, metal cutting, manufacturing · Michigan

Williams Tooling & Manufacturing, Inc.

Dorr, MI · ~21 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Williams Tooling & Manufacturing, Inc. runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Dies, steel rule, metal cutting, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Williams Tooling & Manufacturing, Inc.: 2.1 TCR = 63% of Dies, steel rule, metal cutting, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Williams Tooling & Manufacturing, Inc. safety composite

Williams Tooling & Manufacturing, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Williams Tooling & Manufacturing, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Williams Tooling & Manufacturing, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=8.2 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Dorr, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/131
  • PHOTO Barn Light Electric
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Barn Light Electric (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Williams Tooling & Manufacturing, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Williams Tooling & Manufacturing, Inc. averages 2.1 TCR (63% of the Dies, steel rule, metal cutting, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Williams Tooling & Manufacturing, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=8.2 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Williams Tooling & Manufacturing, Inc. falls in its industry

387 Dies, steel rule, metal cuttin establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 131 Dies, steel rule, metal cuttin employers in Michigan.

Williams Tooling & Manufacturing, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Williams Tooling & Manufacturing, Inc.
Williams Tooling & Manufacturing, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Williams Tooling & Manufacturing, Inc. has fewer employees than the Dies, steel rule, metal cutting, manufac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 8.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.3 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · MI · Dorr

387 Dies, steel rule, metal cutting, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 8 employers in Dorr, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Barn Light Electric 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR J.V. Manufacturing 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR FUTURE MOLD CORPORATION 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Die Company, Inc. 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms Sturgis 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE BE Cultivation 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4605_15228 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willard DeHaan & Son Grnhs 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Leppinks Dorr 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Branch Office 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Modern Roofing, Inc. 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Frontier Truck Parts, Inc. 58 FTE
NAT-TCR Bastyr University 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rocky Mount Ofc and Svc Ctr 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Victoria Svc Ctr 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ivyland 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE WinSupply W Sioux Falls SD Co 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gaumats International LLC 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marketplace at Avalon Park, LLC 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE MRC Global - 056 Harvey LA 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.