Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

Willows Landing Senior Living

Monticello, MN · ~36 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Willows Landing Senior Living runs at 210% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Willows Landing Senior Living: 8.0 TCR = 210% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Willows Landing Senior Living safety composite

Willows Landing Senior Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Willows Landing Senior Living: 0.0 → 8.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 11.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Willows Landing Senior Living's TCR rose 8.7 from 0.0 in 2020 to 8.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 11.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Monticello, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 210% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #115/226
  • PHOTO Warm Beach Healthcar…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Warm Beach Healthcare Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Willows Landing Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Willows Landing Senior Living averages 8.0 TCR (210% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Willows Landing Senior Living TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=11.8 · 2022=11.3 · 2023=8.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Willows Landing Senior Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #115 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Willows Landing Senior Living (36 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Willows Landing Senior Living
Willows Landing Senior Living (36 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Willows Landing Senior Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.7 0.0 3 0 0
2022 11.3 0.0 4 0 0
2021 11.8 3.9 1 2 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Monticello

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 70 employers in Monticello, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Warm Beach Healthcare Center 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR American House - Riverview 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Point 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Hill 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Prairie Moon Nursery 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience - Olivia MN R&D 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Counties Cooperative Litchfield 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2011-Stanton, MN (Monsanto Co.) 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dist Office 599 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monticello High School 588 FTE
CITY-NEAR CCH Monticello 571 FTE
CITY-NEAR CentraCare Monticello 487 FTE
NAT-TCR RK-042-Frankfort ( RK-042 ) 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 0710 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cherryvale Rockford IL Thrift Store 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rosewood on Broadway 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE DW Loiselle Water Treatment Plant 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Redmond Store 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Teikuro Ohio 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE MCRT3 West Monroe Tenant LLC 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.