Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Wilson House

Wilson, NC · ~58 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wilson House runs at 270% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Wilson House: 10.3 TCR = 270% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wilson House safety composite

Wilson House scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2016→2024

Wilson House injury rate improved

Wilson House's TCR fell 0.8 from 9.0 in 2016 to 8.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 15.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.0 · 2017=15.9 · 2018=14.8 · 2019=14.9 · 2020=14.9 · 2021=9.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=5.2 · 2024=8.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Wilson, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 270% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #285/356
  • PHOTO Brookdale Folsom
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Folsom (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Wilson House in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wilson House averages 10.3 TCR (270% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wilson House TCR series: 2016=9 · 2017=15.9 · 2018=14.8 · 2019=14.9 · 2020=14.9 · 2021=9.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.2 · 2024=8.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Wilson House falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #285 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Wilson House (58 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Wilson House
Wilson House (58 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Wilson House has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.1 2.7 3 0 0
2023 5.2 2.6 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 9.7 0.0 4 0 0
2020 14.9 4.3 6 1 0
2019 14.9 9.9 9 0 0
2018 14.8 1.6 9 0 0
2017 15.9 5.3 9 0 0
2016 9.0 5.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Wilson

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 148 employers in Wilson, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Folsom 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63119 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodbriar Place 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63321 10.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wilmington North Operations Complex 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Administration 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE TMI Services, Inc. 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE North State Environmental 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wilson (BAMG) 1,797 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Wilson 1,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kidde Aerospace & Defense 1,064 FTE
CITY-NEAR DLP Wilson Medical Center 907 FTE
NAT-TCR Sesolinc Grp., Inc 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Blaine Mn - 3188 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ovid Healthcare Center 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Borton Packing Center 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sun Environmental Corp 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clear Lake Lumber Inc 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Centric Pipe - Bossier City 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE 26-Emcaz-Chandler Cadillac 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.