Motor generator sets (except automotive, turbine generator sets) manufacturing · Minnesota

Winco Inc

Le Center, MN · ~74 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Winco Inc runs at 272% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Motor generator sets (except automotive, turbine generator sets) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Winco Inc: 9.0 TCR = 272% of Motor generator sets (except automotive, turbine generator sets) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Winco Inc safety composite

Winco Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2016→2023

Winco Inc injury rate improved

Winco Inc's TCR fell 2.8 from 6.4 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 14.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.4 · 2017=8.9 · 2018=10.3 · 2019=10.8 · 2020=9.4 · 2021=8.5 · 2022=14.1 · 2023=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335312 · Le Center, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.0 · 272% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #9/9
  • PHOTO DMC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DMC (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Winco Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Winco Inc averages 9.0 TCR (272% of the Motor generator sets (except automotive, turbine generator sets) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Winco Inc TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2017=8.9 · 2018=10.3 · 2019=10.8 · 2020=9.4 · 2021=8.5 · 2022=14.1 · 2023=3.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Winco Inc falls in its industry

222 Motor generator sets (except a establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 9 Motor generator sets (except a employers in Minnesota.

Winco Inc (74 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Winco Inc
Winco Inc (74 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Winco Inc has fewer employees than the Motor generator sets (except automotive, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.5 1.8 2 0 0
2022 14.1 5.1 8 3 0
2021 8.5 4.3 7 5 0
2020 9.4 1.6 3 3 0
2019 10.8 3.1 4 3 0
2018 10.3 7.4 6 1 0
2017 8.9 7.5 6 0 0
2016 6.4 6.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335312 · MN · Le Center

222 Motor generator sets (except automotive, turbine generator sets) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 15 employers in Le Center, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DMC 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wenzlau Engineering 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Electric Machinery Company LLC 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR LINAK U.S. Inc. - Louisville 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Willet Hauser Company, LLC 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE BT Shoreview 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wenzel Plymouth Plumbing 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metro Home Insulation 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Le Sueur County 255 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maud Borup Inc Le Center 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maud Borup Inc 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dianne's Fine Desserts 176 FTE
NAT-TCR CACHIC-AEG-CHICO 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Desert Winds development, Inc. 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Landmark of Baton Rouge 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Walla Walla Foundry Inc. 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE TRB Oilfield Services, Inc. 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moore Nanotechnology Systems 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Apricot Lane Farms 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE dba Diversicare of Hutchinson.LP 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.