Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing · California

Wing Lee Farm Corporation

Name: Wing Lee Farm Corporation Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Chino, CA · ~64 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 4.7
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wing Lee Farm Corporation runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing workplace, earning a grade D.

Wing Lee Farm Corporation: 4.7 TCR = 142% of Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wing Lee Farm Corporation safety composite

Wing Lee Farm Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 4.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers
DART rate: A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Wing Lee Farm Corporation held a steady TCR band

Wing Lee Farm Corporation's TCR held near 0.2 from 4.8 in 2023 to 4.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=4.8 · 2024=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Chino, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 142% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #9/14
PHOTO DRAPER VALLEY MAIN O…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 6 inj
SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DRAPER VALLEY MAIN OFFICE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

This site

4.7
DRAPER VALLEY

4.7
Washington Pla

4.7
Best Dressed C

4.7
PILGRIMS COLD

4.7

What this shows Wing Lee Farm Corporation averages 4.7 TCR (142% of the Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing BLS benchmark).

Wing Lee Farm Corporation TCR series: 2023=4.8 · 2024=4.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Wing Lee Farm Corporation falls in its industry

509 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 14 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, employers in California.

Wing Lee Farm Corporation (64 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Wing Lee Farm Corporation has fewer employees than the Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, fr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2024	4.5	0.0	3	0	0
2023	4.8	0.0	3	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · CA · Chino

509 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 268 employers in Chino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	DRAPER VALLEY MAIN OFFICE	MT VERNON, WA	4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Washington Plant	WASHINGTON, IN	4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Best Dressed Chicken Inc.	WARD, SC	4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	PILGRIMS COLD SPRING - JFC- LLC	COLD SPRING, MN	4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Costa Farms, Inc.	SOLEDAD	64 FTE
STATE-SIZE	MDERA	MADERA	64 FTE
STATE-SIZE	AGS FARM LABOR CORPORATION	PORTERVILLE	64 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Arroyo Seco Vineyards, Inc	DELANO	64 FTE
CITY-NEAR	4078	Chino	2,902 FTE
CITY-NEAR	8103	Chino	2,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 4078	Chino	1,732 FTE
CITY-NEAR	California Institution for Men	Chino	1,680 FTE
NAT-TCR	Denver, Nc Branch	Denver, NC	4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Eagle Granite	Elberton, GA	4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Capitol Coastal Jacksonville	Jacksonville, FL	4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Msher - Hernando	Hernando, MS	4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE	STR0616	Gadsden, AL	64 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Noland Hospital Tuscaloosa	Tuscaloosa, AL	64 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Chr Hansen - New Berlin	New Berlin, WI	64 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Peterson Farms Seed	Harwood, ND	64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.