Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

Wingate Residences at Haverhill

Haverhill, MA · ~66 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wingate Residences at Haverhill runs at 111% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Wingate Residences at Haverhill: 4.2 TCR = 111% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wingate Residences at Haverhill safety composite

Wingate Residences at Haverhill scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2019→2024

Wingate Residences at Haverhill injury rate improved

Wingate Residences at Haverhill's TCR fell 0.4 from 0.4 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.4 · 2020=9.7 · 2021=2.2 · 2023=8.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Haverhill, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.2 · 111% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #52/210
  • PHOTO CELEBRATION VILLA OF…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CELEBRATION VILLA OF LEWISBURG (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Wingate Residences at Haverhill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wingate Residences at Haverhill averages 4.2 TCR (111% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wingate Residences at Haverhill TCR series: 2019=0.4 · 2020=9.7 · 2021=2.2 · 2023=8.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Wingate Residences at Haverhill falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

Wingate Residences at Haverhill (66 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Wingate Residences at Haverhill
Wingate Residences at Haverhill (66 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Wingate Residences at Haverhill has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 8.7 8.7 1 3 0
2021 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2020 9.7 9.7 4 0 0
2019 0.4 0.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Haverhill

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 87 employers in Haverhill, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CELEBRATION VILLA OF LEWISBURG 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Management GTHI Talamore Woodbury 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR FM Pelican, LLC 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10294 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE A&M Roofing Services, LLC 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE New England electrical contracting corp 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE BT Auburndale 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Office-Main 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cedars Mediterranean Foods 1,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brooks Brothers Group - Southwick 501 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #09 459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #9 371 FTE
NAT-TCR Muskegon Sales Branch 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Twinmed, LLC - Pennsylvania 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Broadcom Irvine Food 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR DH Pace Company - Tampa 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE NSK-AKS Corporation 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mennowood Retirement Community 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE CA Ventura 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allied Supply 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.