Zinc foil and leaf not made in rolling mills · Alabama

Wingfield Engineering Co.

Goodwater, AL · ~51 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Wingfield Engineering Co. runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Zinc foil and leaf not made in rolling mills workplace, earning a grade A.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
avg TCR · per 100 workers
3.3
industry benchmark (BLS)
1
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Wingfield Engineering Co.'s OSHA Total Case Rate of 0.4 to the Zinc foil and leaf not made in rolling mills BLS benchmark of 3.3 (12% of benchmark) across 8 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

Wingfield Engineering Co.'s yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.

-101234 20162017201820192020202120222023 03.3 Industry benchmarkWingfield Engineering Co. TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 332999.

Where Wingfield Engineering Co. falls in its industry

880 Zinc foil and leaf not made in establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 20 Zinc foil and leaf not made in employers in Alabama.

Trend analysis for Wingfield Engineering Co.

Between 2016 and 2023, Wingfield Engineering Co.'s Total Case Rate held roughly steady from 0.0 to 0.0 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 0% change across 7 years of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2016, at a TCR of 0.0, while 2017 saw the highest rate, at 3.1, a spread of 3.1 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.

Summed across those 8 reporting years, Wingfield Engineering Co. recorded 1 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 8-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 1 injuries shown on this page for Wingfield Engineering Co. are sourced from its own 8 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 332999 - Zinc foil and leaf not made in rolling mills.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2023)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 76,010 hours worked = 0.00 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Wingfield Engineering Co. (this establishment) 0.39 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 8-year avg
Machine bases, metal, manufacturing industry avg 3.30 BLS IIF, NAICS 332999
Alabama state avg (all industries) 4.09 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Wingfield Engineering Co. to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Wingfield Engineering Co.'s reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Zinc foil and leaf not made in rolling mills peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.

  • At 12% of the Zinc foil and leaf not made in rolling mills benchmark, Wingfield Engineering Co. reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Zinc foil and leaf not made in rolling mills sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Wingfield Engineering Co.'s safety grade?
Wingfield Engineering Co. has a safety grade of A (Excellent Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 0.4 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.3 for Zinc foil and leaf not made in rolling mills.
How many injuries has Wingfield Engineering Co. reported?
Wingfield Engineering Co. has reported 1 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 8 years of OSHA data (2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Alabama, and by nearby establishments in Goodwater - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Similar TCR (~0.4)

Similar size (~51 workers)

Nearby in Goodwater

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.