All Other Misc Fabricated Metal Products Manufact · North Carolina

Filtration : Greensboro IPF

Greensboro, NC · ~42 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Filtration : Greensboro IPF runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical All Other Misc Fabricated Metal Products Manufact workplace, earning a grade A.

Filtration : Greensboro IPF: 0.4 TCR = 12% of All Other Misc Fabricated Metal Products Manufact BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Filtration : Greensboro IPF safety composite

Filtration : Greensboro IPF scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Filtration : Greensboro IPF held a steady TCR band

Filtration : Greensboro IPF's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332999 · Greensboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/20
  • PHOTO Allied Tube and Cond…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Allied Tube and Conduit Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Filtration : Greensboro IPF in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Filtration : Greensboro IPF averages 0.4 TCR (12% of the All Other Misc Fabricated Metal Products Manufact BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Filtration : Greensboro IPF TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Filtration : Greensboro IPF falls in its industry

827 All Other Misc Fabricated Meta establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 20 All Other Misc Fabricated Meta employers in North Carolina.

Filtration : Greensboro IPF (42 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Filtration : Greensboro IPF
Filtration : Greensboro IPF (42 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Filtration : Greensboro IPF has fewer employees than the All Other Misc Fabricated Metal Products median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332999 · NC · Greensboro

827 All Other Misc Fabricated Metal Products Manufact employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Allied Tube and Conduit Corporation 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wingfield Engineering Co. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Honeywell Electronic Materials Spokane 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CV Technology, Inc. 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mount Vernon Hatchery 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE CPI USA NC LLC - Southport 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALBEMARLE-WMSTN 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin Operations Center 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR Fluid Connectors : Union City TITUS 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cleary Building Corporation 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 24M Technologies Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Stanley Black and Decker 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE STL International, Inc. 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bath & Body Works #858 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nj550 - Meadowlands Village 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE 05-42-00 Jacksonville Dc 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.