Skilled nursing facilities · Nevada

Wingfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation

Sparks, NV · ~112 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wingfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation runs at 230% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Wingfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation: 14.9 TCR = 230% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wingfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation safety composite

Wingfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2022→2024

Wingfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation injury rate improved

Wingfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation's TCR fell 2.2 from 16.1 in 2022 to 13.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 16.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=16.1 · 2023=14.8 · 2024=13.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Sparks, NV ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.9 · 230% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #58/64
  • PHOTO Westhaven Community
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~112 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Westhaven Community (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

Wingfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wingfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation averages 14.9 TCR (230% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wingfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation TCR series: 2022=16.1 · 2023=14.8 · 2024=13.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Wingfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nevada alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #58 safest of 64 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Nevada.

Wingfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation (112 employees, TCR 14.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Wingfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation
Wingfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation (112 employees, TCR 14.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Wingfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.8 6.5 15 0 0
2023 14.8 3.7 20 0 0
2022 16.1 4.8 8 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NV · Sparks

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 321 employers in Sparks, NV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Westhaven Community 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hickory Creek of Athens 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MISSON HEALTH COMMUNITY 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Center MD 14.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tri Pointe Homes Las Vegas 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Las Vegas Stadium 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2453-00060351-60351Q 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE SupplyHouse Nevada LLC 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-NV-Sparks-1-Electric Ave 7,992 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue 7,272 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue-Gigafactory 2,822 FTE
CITY-NEAR NVRNO - RENO HUB 1,324 FTE
NAT-TCR Rexburg ID DI 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Howard Engineering LLC 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Stratford Ct 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Maryvale School 14.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hotel aka Back Bay 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hole Products, LLC 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phoenix Closures 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coho Distributing, LLC - Bend 112 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.