Catalog (i.e., order taking) offices of mail-order houses · Illinois

Winston Brands Warehouse

Melrose Park, IL · ~203 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Winston Brands Warehouse runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Catalog (i.e., order taking) offices of mail-order houses workplace, earning a grade C.

Winston Brands Warehouse: 3.5 TCR = 102% of Catalog (i.e., order taking) offices of mail-order houses BLS 3.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Winston Brands Warehouse safety composite

Winston Brands Warehouse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2017→2020

Winston Brands Warehouse injury rate improved

Winston Brands Warehouse's TCR fell 2.2 from 3.8 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.8 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 454113 · Melrose Park, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 102% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO 99625B04 CAREMARK, L…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~203 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 99625B04 CAREMARK, L.L.C. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Winston Brands Warehouse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Winston Brands Warehouse averages 3.5 TCR (102% of the Catalog (i.e., order taking) offices of mail-order houses BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Winston Brands Warehouse TCR series: 2017=3.8 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=1.6 · BLS 3.4

Where Winston Brands Warehouse falls in its industry

98 Catalog (i.e., order taking) o establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Catalog (i.e., order taking) o employers in Illinois.

Winston Brands Warehouse (203 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 388 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Winston Brands Warehouse
Winston Brands Warehouse (203 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 388 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Winston Brands Warehouse has fewer employees than the Catalog (i.e., order taking) offices of median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.6 1.6 3 0 0
2019 4.3 4.3 6 0 0
2018 4.3 4.3 6 0 0
2017 3.8 3.8 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

454113 · IL · Melrose Park

98 Catalog (i.e., order taking) offices of mail-order houses employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 96 employers in Melrose Park, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 99625B04 CAREMARK, L.L.C. 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sportsman's Guide 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Radial inc 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR OceanX COH 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Unistrut International Corporation 203 FTE
STATE-SIZE Romaine Empire, Inc - Cicero 203 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ohio Medical 203 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cardinal Health Aurora, IL PD 203 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jewel Distribution DC 1,169 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAI-0032-0032-06651 FAC-06651-MELROSE PARK-IL 1,106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gottlieb Memorial Hospital 923 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC - Ruby Street Plant 714 FTE
NAT-TCR Senior High School 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Gas Division 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Humphreys County Community Health Services, Inc. d/b/a Three Rivers Hospital 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Drylock Technologies 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nanticoke Physician Network 203 FTE
NAT-SIZE flambeau hospital 203 FTE
NAT-SIZE Athens Regional Physician Services 203 FTE
NAT-SIZE NOVA Chemicals, Beaver Valley Site 203 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.