Diapers, disposable, made from purchased paper or textile fiber · Wisconsin

Drylock Technologies

Name: Drylock Technologies Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Eau Claire, WI · ~228 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 3.5
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Drylock Technologies runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Diapers, disposable, made from purchased paper or textile fiber workplace, earning a grade C.

Drylock Technologies: 3.5 TCR = 105% of Diapers, disposable, made from purchased paper or textile fiber BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Drylock Technologies safety composite

Drylock Technologies scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 3.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers
DART rate: D 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Drylock Technologies: 1.0 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.57× in 2020

Drylock Technologies's TCR rose 1.8 from 1.0 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322291 · Eau Claire, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 105% of ind

DART 2.0 DART
RANK #10/21
PHOTO Orchids Paper Produc…
BOOK 4y book
INJ 35 inj
SIZE ~228 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Orchids Paper Products Pryor Converting (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

This site

3.5
Orchids Paper

3.5
Tulsa - Conver

3.5
Sofidel Americ

3.5
Medline Indust

3.4

What this shows Drylock Technologies averages 3.5 TCR (105% of the Diapers, disposable, made from purchased paper or textile fiber BLS benchmark).

Drylock Technologies TCR series: 2016=1 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=2.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Drylock Technologies falls in its industry

113 Diapers, disposable, made from establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 21 Diapers, disposable, made from employers in Wisconsin.

Drylock Technologies (228 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Drylock Technologies has more employees than the Diapers, disposable, made from purchased median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2020	2.8	2.0	7
2019	4.4	3.7	12
2018	5.7	5.3	14
2016	1.0	1.0	2

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322291 · WI · Eau Claire

113 Diapers, disposable, made from purchased paper or textile fiber employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 271 employers in Eau Claire, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Orchids Paper Products Pryor Converting	PRYOR, OK	3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Medline Industries-Incont. Dpr Plant-B82 - INC	LITHIA SPRINGS, GA	3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Tulsa - Converting	TULSA, OK	3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Sofidel America Las Vegas	LAS VEGAS, NV	3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Krueger International Bonduel Plant	BONDUEL	228 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Pan-O-Gold Baking Company-Sun Prairie, WI	SUN PRAIRIE	228 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Weather Shield Mfg Inc. ---Millwork Plant 02	MEDFORD	228 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Whiting Mill	STEVENS POINT	228 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Precision Pipeline, LLC	Eau Claire	3,757 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Mayo Clinic Health System-Eau Claire Hospital (Whipple)	Eau Claire	3,141 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WWD Sacred Heart Hospital	Eau Claire	1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR	STORE DIVISION ADMIN - 3019	Eau Claire	900 FTE
NAT-TCR	Humphreys County Community Health Services, Inc. d/b/a Three Rivers Hospital	Waverly, TN	3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Gas Division	Indianapolis, IN	3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Senior High School	Eveleth, MN	3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Winston Brands Warehouse	Melrose Park, IL	3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE	West St Paul ISD #197-Henry Sibley High School	West St Paul, MN	228 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Bates Rubber	Lobelville, TN	228 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Arhauss LLC - Corporate Logistics & Out of State	Boston Heights, OH	228 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Achievement House, Inc.	San Luis Obispo, CA	228 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.