Semiconductor dice and wafers manufacturing · North Carolina

Wolfspeed, Inc. - Moore Drive, RTP, NC

Rtp, NC · ~61 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wolfspeed, Inc. - Moore Drive, RTP, NC runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Semiconductor dice and wafers manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Wolfspeed, Inc. - Moore Drive, RTP, NC: 0.5 TCR = 16% of Semiconductor dice and wafers manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wolfspeed, Inc. - Moore Drive, RTP, NC safety composite

Wolfspeed, Inc. - Moore Drive, RTP, NC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Wolfspeed, Inc. - Moore Drive, RTP, NC: 0.0 → 1.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2024

Wolfspeed, Inc. - Moore Drive, RTP, NC's TCR rose 1.0 from 0.0 in 2023 to 1.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334413 · Rtp, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 16% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #7/15
  • PHOTO NXP USA, Inc Chandler
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NXP USA, Inc Chandler (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Wolfspeed, Inc. - Moore Drive, RTP, NC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wolfspeed, Inc. - Moore Drive, RTP, NC averages 0.5 TCR (16% of the Semiconductor dice and wafers manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wolfspeed, Inc. - Moore Drive, RTP, NC TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Wolfspeed, Inc. - Moore Drive, RTP, NC falls in its industry

437 Semiconductor dice and wafers establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 15 Semiconductor dice and wafers employers in North Carolina.

Wolfspeed, Inc. - Moore Drive, RTP, NC (61 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 216 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Wolfspeed, Inc. - Moore Drive, RTP, NC
Wolfspeed, Inc. - Moore Drive, RTP, NC (61 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 216 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Wolfspeed, Inc. - Moore Drive, RTP, NC has fewer employees than the Semiconductor dice and wafers manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334413 · NC · Rtp

437 Semiconductor dice and wafers manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 8 employers in Rtp, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NXP USA, Inc Chandler 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NGAS-H160 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR QRS 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allegro MicroSystems (Manchester) 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE H. F. Lee Energy Complex 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Winston Salem Resource Center - PNG 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charlotte Division 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE WESTFIELD REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR GlaxoSmithKline Field & Remote 4,001 FTE
CITY-NEAR RTP 1,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Therapeutics Corporation- RTP 588 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wolfspeed - RTP, NC 548 FTE
NAT-TCR Dublin, OH 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Ambulatory Services 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR DuPont Pencader Plant 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR FEI Company, Inc./EFA Products 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Holmes Component Plant 538 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Council Bluffs Service Center 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jamaica Cottage Shop Inc. 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anniston Health and Rehab Services 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.