Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) · Michigan

Wolverine Human Services M & G

Vassar, MI · ~246 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wolverine Human Services M & G runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) workplace, earning a grade B.

Wolverine Human Services M & G: 2.8 TCR = 73% of Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wolverine Human Services M & G safety composite

Wolverine Human Services M & G scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2022

Wolverine Human Services M & G injury rate improved

Wolverine Human Services M & G's TCR fell 1.5 from 4.7 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2019=0.3 · 2022=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · Vassar, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.8 · 73% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #12/44
  • PHOTO Salem
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~246 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Salem (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Wolverine Human Services M & G in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wolverine Human Services M & G averages 2.8 TCR (73% of the Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wolverine Human Services M & G TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2019=0.3 · 2022=3.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Wolverine Human Services M & G falls in its industry

560 Boys' and girls' residential f establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 44 Boys' and girls' residential f employers in Michigan.

Wolverine Human Services M & G (246 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Wolverine Human Services M & G
Wolverine Human Services M & G (246 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

Wolverine Human Services M & G has more employees than the Boys' and girls' residential facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2019 0.3 0.0 2 0 0
2016 4.7 2.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · MI · Vassar

560 Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 9 employers in Vassar, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Salem 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 579511 107100_SACRAMENTO SOUTH_ROHD 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-483170 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 582230 705931_BERTRAM OFFICE_ROHD 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Christman Constructors, Inc - Michigan 246 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seneca Foods 246 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michigan Operations - Auburn Plant 246 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fairview 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wolverine Growth and Recovery Center 364 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vassar House 255 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pioneer Work and Learn Center 253 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clarence Fischer Center 252 FTE
NAT-TCR Hinsdale Central High School 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Massey Services #87 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR West Tennessee Healthcare Volunteer Hospital 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mansfield 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Daehan Solution Alabama 246 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Alamo 45B2 45B4 246 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dura Corportate Office 246 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0188 - Perimeter Ga Whse 246 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.