Oil and gas field-type drilling machinery and equipment (except offshore floating platforms) manufacturing · Texas

WOM - Fairmont

Houston, TX · ~61 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

WOM - Fairmont runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Oil and gas field-type drilling machinery and equipment (except offshore floating platforms) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

WOM - Fairmont: 2.2 TCR = 67% of Oil and gas field-type drilling machinery and equipment (except offshore floating platforms) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

WOM - Fairmont safety composite

WOM - Fairmont scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

WOM - Fairmont: 1.7 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.71× in 2024

WOM - Fairmont's TCR rose 3.0 from 1.7 in 2017 to 4.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333132 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 67% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #162/208
  • PHOTO Norris Rods
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Norris Rods (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

WOM - Fairmont in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows WOM - Fairmont averages 2.2 TCR (67% of the Oil and gas field-type drilling machinery and equipment (except offshore floating platforms) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

WOM - Fairmont TCR series: 2017=1.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 3.3

Where WOM - Fairmont falls in its industry

316 Oil and gas field-type drillin establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #162 safest of 208 Oil and gas field-type drillin employers in Texas.

WOM - Fairmont (61 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate WOM - Fairmont
WOM - Fairmont (61 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 1.3

WOM - Fairmont has fewer employees than the Oil and gas field-type drilling machiner median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 1.6 3 0 0
2023 3.2 3.2 2 0 0
2022 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2021 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2020 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2019 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.7 1.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333132 · TX · Houston

316 Oil and gas field-type drilling machinery and equipment (except offshore floating platforms) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Norris Rods 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hunt Engine Inc 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR EnQuest Energy Solutions 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Weir, Odessa 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Muleshoe Dairy LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Patriot Drilling LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE TEXOMA SVC CTR 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE PEC-Cedar Park 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR LaGrou 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR SnugZ USA, LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Leppert-Nutmeg, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR MK Enterprises, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ag Data Global, LLC 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metropolitan Airport Authority of Rock Island County Illinois 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE E-Z Drill, Inc 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oklahoma City WWTP 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.