Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · New Jersey

Woodbridge Energy Center

Keasbey, NJ · ~22 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Woodbridge Energy Center runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade A.

Woodbridge Energy Center: 0.5 TCR = 38% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Woodbridge Energy Center safety composite

Woodbridge Energy Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Woodbridge Energy Center held a steady TCR band

Woodbridge Energy Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Keasbey, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/14
  • PHOTO Power Producer
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Power Producer (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Woodbridge Energy Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Woodbridge Energy Center averages 0.5 TCR (38% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Woodbridge Energy Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Woodbridge Energy Center falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 14 Electric power generation, fos employers in New Jersey.

Woodbridge Energy Center (22 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Woodbridge Energy Center
Woodbridge Energy Center (22 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Woodbridge Energy Center has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · NJ · Keasbey

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 22 employers in Keasbey, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Power Producer 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PPG-O&M Panda Temple Power LLC 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teche Power Station 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NRG Middletown Power LLC 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE America's Grow-A-Row Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : Red Oak Power 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eagle Point Power Generation, LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Morgan at Provost Square 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-WOOD 2,436 FTE
CITY-NEAR 89 1,416 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Drive 691 FTE
CITY-NEAR SOUTHERN PERISHABLES WAREHOUSE 562 FTE
NAT-TCR Global Pipeline Integrity Center 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Franklin Water Treatment - Waunakee 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Stuyvesant Gardens 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR ECC Corporate 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Grain Craft Kansas City 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grain Craft MT 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tualatin Shop 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Holland Plant 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.