Group homes for the disabled with nursing care · California

Woodland Residential Services, Inc

Woodland, CA · ~70 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Woodland Residential Services, Inc runs at 164% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Group homes for the disabled with nursing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Woodland Residential Services, Inc: 10.7 TCR = 164% of Group homes for the disabled with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Woodland Residential Services, Inc safety composite

Woodland Residential Services, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 15.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Woodland Residential Services, Inc: 7.6 → 16.8 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 16.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.43× in 2019

Woodland Residential Services, Inc's TCR rose 9.2 from 7.6 in 2017 to 16.8 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Woodland, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 10.7 · 164% of ind

  • DART 15.3 DART
  • RANK #519/739
  • PHOTO Maple Court Senior R…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maple Court Senior Residence (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Woodland Residential Services, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Woodland Residential Services, Inc averages 10.7 TCR (164% of the Group homes for the disabled with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Woodland Residential Services, Inc TCR series: 2017=7.6 · 2018=7.5 · 2019=16.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Woodland Residential Services, Inc falls in its industry

15,252 Group homes for the disabled w establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #519 safest of 739 Group homes for the disabled w employers in California.

Woodland Residential Services, Inc (70 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Woodland Residential Services, Inc
Woodland Residential Services, Inc (70 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Woodland Residential Services, Inc has fewer employees than the Group homes for the disabled with nursin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 16.8 15.3 11 0 0
2018 7.5 6.0 5 0 0
2017 7.6 4.6 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Woodland

15,252 Group homes for the disabled with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 172 employers in Woodland, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maple Court Senior Residence 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lake Andes Senior Living Center 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Healthpark Hospice House 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR LP E-Town, LLC 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heritage Land Company 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ceballos Ag Services, Inc. 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRTHN 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE EW Merritt Farms 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 800 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0555 - Woodland CA DC 1,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0555 - Sacramento DC 1,196 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030173 820 FTE
NAT-TCR Snell Farm Childrens Center (SFCC) 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Aa Admirals Club Phl a West 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Healthpark Hospice House 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilkes Barre, PA 10.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atlas Metal Parts & Fabricating, Inc. 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hydro - The Dalles Cast 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marriott Boston Courtyard Marlborough 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE A. J. Oster 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.