Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Merrill Gardens at Rolling Hills Estates

Rolling Hills Estates, CA · ~59 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Merrill Gardens at Rolling Hills Estates runs at 571% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Merrill Gardens at Rolling Hills Estates: 21.7 TCR = 571% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Merrill Gardens at Rolling Hills Estates safety composite

Merrill Gardens at Rolling Hills Estates scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−31.6

2022→2024

Merrill Gardens at Rolling Hills Estates injury rate improved

Merrill Gardens at Rolling Hills Estates's TCR fell 31.6 from 43.1 in 2022 to 11.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 43.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=43.1 · 2023=10.5 · 2024=11.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Rolling Hills Estates, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.7 · 571% of ind

  • DART 5.7 DART
  • RANK #599/635
  • PHOTO Dickinson Countryhou…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dickinson Countryhouse LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Merrill Gardens at Rolling Hills Estates in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Merrill Gardens at Rolling Hills Estates averages 21.7 TCR (571% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Merrill Gardens at Rolling Hills Estates TCR series: 2022=43.1 · 2023=10.5 · 2024=11.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Merrill Gardens at Rolling Hills Estates falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #599 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Merrill Gardens at Rolling Hills Estates (59 employees, TCR 21.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Merrill Gardens at Rolling Hills Estates
Merrill Gardens at Rolling Hills Estates (59 employees, TCR 21.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Merrill Gardens at Rolling Hills Estates has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.5 5.7 6 0 0
2023 10.5 10.5 5 0 0
2022 43.1 30.4 8 9 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Rolling Hills Estates

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 4 employers in Rolling Hills Estates, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dickinson Countryhouse LLC 21.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cimarron Labor, LLC 21.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Bungalows at Branson Meadows 21.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodlands Memory Care of Lewiston 21.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE DFFF-Salinas 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE LOMA 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.R. AG SOLUTIONS, INC. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE F&J FERNANDEZ CONTRACTING 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rolling Hills Country Club 203 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bristol Farms - 001 - Rolling Hills 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3360 - Rolling Hills 73 FTE
NAT-TCR Women's Huron Valley Correctional Facility 21.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Watertown Hatchery 21.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Buf-Ground Ops 21.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Homewood Suites Gainesville FL 21.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE South Shore MA 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE NV027 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Faulkner Buick GMC 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE One Family Logistics and Delivery LLC 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.