Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Maine

Woodlands Senior Living of Farmington LLC

Farmington, ME · ~50 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Woodlands Senior Living of Farmington LLC runs at 226% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Woodlands Senior Living of Farmington LLC: 8.6 TCR = 226% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Woodlands Senior Living of Farmington LLC safety composite

Woodlands Senior Living of Farmington LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Woodlands Senior Living of Farmington LLC: 0.0 → 8.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 17.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.76× in 2022

Woodlands Senior Living of Farmington LLC's TCR rose 8.7 from 0.0 in 2017 to 8.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 17.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Farmington, ME ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.6 · 226% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #14/47
  • PHOTO Oakmont of Redding
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oakmont of Redding (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

Woodlands Senior Living of Farmington LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Woodlands Senior Living of Farmington LLC averages 8.6 TCR (226% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Woodlands Senior Living of Farmington LLC TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=17.8 · 2019=13.2 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=6.5 · 2022=8.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Woodlands Senior Living of Farmington LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maine alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 47 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Maine.

Woodlands Senior Living of Farmington LLC (50 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Woodlands Senior Living of Farmington LLC
Woodlands Senior Living of Farmington LLC (50 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Woodlands Senior Living of Farmington LLC has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.7 6.5 4 0 0
2021 6.5 6.5 2 1 0
2020 5.3 5.3 3 0 0
2019 13.2 7.5 7 0 0
2018 17.8 17.8 6 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · ME · Farmington

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 21 employers in Farmington, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oakmont of Redding 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spectrum Health Companies McGregor 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parc at Sharon Amity 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ivy Park at Otay Ranch 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE John Khiel III Logging and Chipping Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE NU-ME 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE NTension Corp 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ranor Inc. 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCHN - Franklin Memorial Hospital 432 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1866 280 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1866 265 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08291 - Store # 8291 Farmington 154 FTE
NAT-TCR Bull Moose Tube 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0035-0035-02853 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Doas Nc 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 1855-TXWAC3 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE HG1022 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG1056 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG394 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sheltered Workshop 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.