Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Indiana

Woodview Assisted Living

Fort Wayne, IN · ~69 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Woodview Assisted Living runs at 195% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Woodview Assisted Living: 7.4 TCR = 195% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Woodview Assisted Living safety composite

Woodview Assisted Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Woodview Assisted Living: 3.6 → 8.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 11.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.46× in 2019

Woodview Assisted Living's TCR rose 5.0 from 3.6 in 2016 to 8.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Fort Wayne, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.4 · 195% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #84/136
  • PHOTO Eagle Crest South
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eagle Crest South (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Woodview Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Woodview Assisted Living averages 7.4 TCR (195% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Woodview Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=11.9 · 2019=8.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Woodview Assisted Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #84 safest of 136 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Indiana.

Woodview Assisted Living (69 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Woodview Assisted Living
Woodview Assisted Living (69 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Woodview Assisted Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 8.6 3.4 5 0 0
2018 11.9 10.2 6 1 0
2017 5.5 3.7 3 0 0
2016 3.6 3.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IN · Fort Wayne

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 634 employers in Fort Wayne, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eagle Crest South 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Fountains 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wind Crest 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oxford Sasche Memory Care LTD 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vectren Corporation - Vectren Technology Acceleration Center 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kennedy Tank & Manufacturing Co., Inc. Field Division 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coil Processors LLC 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henry C. Smither Roofing Co., Inc. 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview Memorial Hospital 6,096 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview North Hospital 4,648 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview Corporate Office 3,312 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shambaugh & Son LP 3,072 FTE
NAT-TCR Geronimo Wall Systems 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Drury Inn & Suites - Colorado Springs Near the Air Force Academy 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hospital Hima San Pablo Humacao 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Enterprise Rent A Car - Valencia 7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE MODUSERVE 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Trenching Inc. 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chadwick Service Company 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pageland Hatchery 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.