Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Minnesota

Worthington Ag Parts

Worthington, MN · ~22 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.3
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Worthington Ag Parts runs at 634% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Worthington Ag Parts: 13.3 TCR = 634% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Worthington Ag Parts safety composite

Worthington Ag Parts scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 15.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Worthington Ag Parts: 4.9 → 15.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 21.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.17× in 2024

Worthington Ag Parts's TCR rose 10.7 from 4.9 in 2020 to 15.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 21.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Worthington, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.3 · 634% of ind

  • DART 15.6 DART
  • RANK #54/56
  • PHOTO Whaley Foodservice-B…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Whaley Foodservice-Birmingham (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Worthington Ag Parts in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Worthington Ag Parts averages 13.3 TCR (634% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Worthington Ag Parts TCR series: 2020=4.9 · 2021=19.2 · 2022=5 · 2023=21.9 · 2024=15.6 · BLS 2.1

Where Worthington Ag Parts falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 56 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in Minnesota.

Worthington Ag Parts (22 employees, TCR 13.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Worthington Ag Parts
Worthington Ag Parts (22 employees, TCR 13.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Worthington Ag Parts has fewer employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.6 15.6 3 0 0
2023 21.9 16.4 4 0 0
2022 5.0 5.0 1 0 0
2021 19.2 14.4 4 0 0
2020 4.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MN · Worthington

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 59 employers in Worthington, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Whaley Foodservice-Birmingham 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR D-Electric Incorporated 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR IFS-CA-SF 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PepsiCo - Sellersburg Certified Center - Grayhawk Leasing, LLC 13.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunrise Dairy 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Emerald Spring Dairy, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silverstreak Dairy LLC, Greenstreak Dairy 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dassel 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWIFT PORK COMPANY - WORTHINGTON 2,136 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWIFT PORK COMPANY WORTHINGTON 2,113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bedford Industries 416 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN,WORTHINGTON - Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 272 FTE
NAT-TCR Bineham Construction, Inc. 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Taylor Family Ymca - Ymca of the Triangle 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR WAE001 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Berkeley Bowl Main 13.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE TGC Hospitality Management, LLC/TownePlace Suites Macon Mercer 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allendale Biomass LLC 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ryder Systems Inc. 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Impact Fire - College Station 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.