Sprinkler system, building, installation · Texas

Impact Fire - College Station

College Station, TX · ~22 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Impact Fire - College Station runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Sprinkler system, building, installation workplace, earning a grade B.

Impact Fire - College Station: 1.5 TCR = 54% of Sprinkler system, building, installation BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Impact Fire - College Station safety composite

Impact Fire - College Station scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2020→2024

Impact Fire - College Station injury rate improved

Impact Fire - College Station's TCR fell 4.7 from 4.7 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=4.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · College Station, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.5 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #139/408
  • PHOTO El Cerrito
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: El Cerrito (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Impact Fire - College Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Impact Fire - College Station averages 1.5 TCR (54% of the Sprinkler system, building, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Impact Fire - College Station TCR series: 2020=4.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Impact Fire - College Station falls in its industry

5,793 Sprinkler system, building, in establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #139 safest of 408 Sprinkler system, building, in employers in Texas.

Impact Fire - College Station (22 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Impact Fire - College Station
Impact Fire - College Station (22 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Impact Fire - College Station has fewer employees than the Sprinkler system, building, installation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.7 4.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · TX · College Station

5,793 Sprinkler system, building, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 149 employers in College Station, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR El Cerrito 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cal Pacific Systems 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bruce Mechanical of Colorado, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acres & Son Plumbing, Inc. 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE LQ0706 Dallas - North Central 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Radiant Plumbing and Air Conditioning 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE LQ0963 Houston - Galleria Area 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE 02-San Marcos 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - College Station 1,289 FTE
CITY-NEAR College Station Office 991 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scott & White Hospital - College Station 819 FTE
CITY-NEAR College Station,TX 725 FTE
NAT-TCR CSD - Holley Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR DH Pace Company - Chicago 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sullivan & Poore, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Nowata 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ryder Systems Inc. 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allendale Biomass LLC 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE TGC Hospitality Management, LLC/TownePlace Suites Macon Mercer 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Worthington Ag Parts 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.