Information management computer systems integration design services · Minnesota

Wright County- Information Technology

Buffalo, MN · ~34 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wright County- Information Technology runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Information management computer systems integration design services workplace, earning a grade C.

Wright County- Information Technology: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Information management computer systems integration design services BLS 0.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wright County- Information Technology safety composite

Wright County- Information Technology scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Wright County- Information Technology held a steady TCR band

Wright County- Information Technology's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.0 TCR.

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541512 · Buffalo, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/9
  • PHOTO Hopkinton 228
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hopkinton 228 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Wright County- Information Technology in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wright County- Information Technology averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Information management computer systems integration design services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wright County- Information Technology TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Wright County- Information Technology falls in its industry

181 Information management compute establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 9 Information management compute employers in Minnesota.

Wright County- Information Technology (34 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Wright County- Information Technology
Wright County- Information Technology (34 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3

Wright County- Information Technology has fewer employees than the Information management computer systems median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541512 · MN · Buffalo

181 Information management computer systems integration design services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 74 employers in Buffalo, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hopkinton 228 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US CO Aurora E Steamboat Ave (1666) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southboro 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Franklin 55 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE KBQ, Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Daybreak Foods, Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forsman Farms SH 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Klaphake Feed Mill Inc. 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health One Buffalo (Buffalo Hospital) 532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health One Buffalo 500 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1577 404 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1577 320 FTE
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gap Inc. - Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Raleigh Managed Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bigfoot Beverages Roseburg 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Home Office 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dura-Tech Processes, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE IP Hammond. (SMRU0843) 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.