Distribution of electric power · Minnesota

Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association

Rockford, MN · ~105 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association runs at 386% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association: 4.6 TCR = 386% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association safety composite

Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association: 4.3 → 8.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.43× in 2024

Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association's TCR rose 3.7 from 4.3 in 2019 to 8.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Rockford, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 4.6 · 386% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #46/85
  • PHOTO Kingston
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kingston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association averages 4.6 TCR (386% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association TCR series: 2019=4.3 · 2020=2.1 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=8 · BLS 1.2

Where Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 85 Distribution of electric power employers in Minnesota.

Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association (105 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association
Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association (105 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.0 2.0 8 0 0
2023 4.1 1.0 4 0 0
2020 2.1 0.0 2 0 0
2019 4.3 3.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MN · Rockford

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 16 employers in Rockford, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kingston 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR UES-SEA 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SAN LUIS OBISPO SERVICE CENTER 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SECO Energy - Groveland 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Minnesota 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Boldt Company - Cloquet, MN 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peterson Sheetmetal 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kemps Farmington Plant 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockford Elementary Schools (110) 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockford Elementary Schools 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockford High School (300) 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockford High School 79 FTE
NAT-TCR Orlando Combo 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Riutel Florida Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Peoria Charter Coach Company Urbana Facility 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 1544 - Stamford 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2368 - Bullhead City 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Radiac Abrasives - Oswego 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1914 - Osage Beach 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE RDF Builders Co. 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.