Distribution of electric power · New York

Kingston

Lake Katrine, NY · ~173 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kingston runs at 386% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Kingston: 4.6 TCR = 386% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kingston safety composite

Kingston scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2017→2024

Kingston injury rate improved

Kingston's TCR fell 4.2 from 6.5 in 2017 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.5 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=7.9 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Lake Katrine, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 4.6 · 386% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #95/110
  • PHOTO Wright Hennepin Coop…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~173 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Kingston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kingston averages 4.6 TCR (386% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kingston TCR series: 2017=6.5 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=7.9 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 1.2

Where Kingston falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #95 safest of 110 Distribution of electric power employers in New York.

Kingston (173 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Kingston
Kingston (173 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Kingston has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 1.9 3 2 0
2023 4.2 1.6 7 1 0
2022 1.1 0.5 2 0 0
2021 2.9 1.1 4 1 0
2020 7.9 2.4 8 5 0
2019 6.6 2.0 8 2 0
2018 5.6 1.4 6 2 0
2017 6.5 3.6 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · NY · Lake Katrine

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 7 employers in Lake Katrine, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR UES-SEA 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SAN LUIS OBISPO SERVICE CENTER 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SECO Energy - Groveland 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Reale Construction Co.,Inc 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arista 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schenectady 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Salerno Packaging Inc. 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northeast Center for Rehabilitation and Brain Injury 329 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bread Alone Lake Katrine 256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mental Health Association in Ulster County, Inc. 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR WCD Window Coverings, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-TCR Bayview Vineyards, INC 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Rusken Packaging Inc. of Clarksville 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR American Falls 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Metro Transit Nicollet Garage 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Melhorn Sales Service and Trucking 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03327 - Phoenix Hauling South 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04140 - Philadelphia Hauling - Delaware Valley North 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Golden State Construction & Framing 173 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.