Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing · California

Wright Pharma

Modesto, CA · ~23 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wright Pharma runs at 210% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Wright Pharma: 6.9 TCR = 210% of Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wright Pharma safety composite

Wright Pharma scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Wright Pharma: 4.9 → 9.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 9.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Wright Pharma's TCR rose 4.8 from 4.9 in 2021 to 9.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325412 · Modesto, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 210% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #69/79
  • PHOTO Contract Pharmacal C…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Contract Pharmacal Corp. 145 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Wright Pharma in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wright Pharma averages 6.9 TCR (210% of the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wright Pharma TCR series: 2021=4.9 · 2022=9.2 · 2023=4 · 2024=9.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Wright Pharma falls in its industry

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 79 Pharmaceutical preparations (e employers in California.

Wright Pharma (23 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Wright Pharma
Wright Pharma (23 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Wright Pharma has fewer employees than the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.6 0.0 2 0 0
2023 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2022 9.2 0.0 2 0 0
2021 4.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325412 · CA · Modesto

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 418 employers in Modesto, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Contract Pharmacal Corp. 145 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medline Industries - Hartland - HRT 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bimeda San Angelo 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tower Laboratories Ltd. 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE James Diedrich Farms 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-Fanucchi Farms,LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAN2 - 04 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kyer Farms 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30240) 3,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Modesto Operations 3,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-930 3,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR 930 DOCTORS MEDICAL CENTER OF MODESTO 2,759 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DRT4 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Charcuterie Artisans (Daniele Inc) 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - KAFW 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR McCallie School 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Saint-Gobain Quartz USA 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE NA-US-IL-Elk Grove -Arthur Ave-Energy 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southwest Concrete Formwork Specialist Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maharishi University of Management 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.