Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise · Georgia

W.S. Badcock Corporation / DCGALA

Lagrange, GA · ~103 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.2
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

W.S. Badcock Corporation / DCGALA runs at 176% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade D.

W.S. Badcock Corporation / DCGALA: 10.2 TCR = 176% of Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

W.S. Badcock Corporation / DCGALA safety composite

W.S. Badcock Corporation / DCGALA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.6

2016→2018

W.S. Badcock Corporation / DCGALA injury rate improved

W.S. Badcock Corporation / DCGALA's TCR fell 7.6 from 14.2 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.2 · 2017=10.0 · 2018=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Lagrange, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 10.2 · 176% of ind

  • DART 5.8 DART
  • RANK #482/506
  • PHOTO Amazon.com Services …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon.com Services LLC - PBI2 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

W.S. Badcock Corporation / DCGALA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows W.S. Badcock Corporation / DCGALA averages 10.2 TCR (176% of the Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

W.S. Badcock Corporation / DCGALA TCR series: 2016=14.2 · 2017=10 · 2018=6.5 · BLS 5.8

Where W.S. Badcock Corporation / DCGALA falls in its industry

9,477 Private warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #482 safest of 506 Private warehousing and storag employers in Georgia.

W.S. Badcock Corporation / DCGALA (103 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate W.S. Badcock Corporation / DCGALA
W.S. Badcock Corporation / DCGALA (103 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

W.S. Badcock Corporation / DCGALA has more employees than the Private warehousing and storage, general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 6.5 5.8 9 0 0
2017 10.0 6.7 12 0 0
2016 14.2 10.3 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · GA · Lagrange

9,477 Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 110 employers in Lagrange, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - PBI2 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beloit FC 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - MDW9 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR B47 10.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Columbus Operating 3610 Gentian Boulevard Columbus GA 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Ga EMC 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anderson Construction Company of Fort Gaines 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE CLINE_Roswell, GA 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellStar West Georgia Medical Center 1,510 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6054 1,157 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6054 1,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sewon 678 FTE
NAT-TCR Salt Lake City (Utslc) 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Faucets Duffin 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tmx2291 - Taunton 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Behavioral Heath Works, Hayward, Inc 10.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Williamansett West Center 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE 30209-Capstone Delhaize Disputanta Va 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE MB-Salt Lake City 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2073-ASA-20730220-IF 103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.