Bonded warehousing, general merchandise · Ohio

Yokohama Columbus Distribution Center

Columbus, OH · ~53 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Yokohama Columbus Distribution Center runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bonded warehousing, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade A.

Yokohama Columbus Distribution Center: 0.8 TCR = 13% of Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Yokohama Columbus Distribution Center safety composite

Yokohama Columbus Distribution Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Yokohama Columbus Distribution Center: 0.0 → 1.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2.22× in 2024

Yokohama Columbus Distribution Center's TCR rose 1.7 from 0.0 in 2021 to 1.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Columbus, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 13% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #42/556
  • PHOTO 30235 - CAPSTONE KRO…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 30235 - CAPSTONE KROGER MEMPHIS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Yokohama Columbus Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Yokohama Columbus Distribution Center averages 0.8 TCR (13% of the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Yokohama Columbus Distribution Center TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 5.8

Where Yokohama Columbus Distribution Center falls in its industry

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general me establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 556 Bonded warehousing, general me employers in Ohio.

Yokohama Columbus Distribution Center (53 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Yokohama Columbus Distribution Center
Yokohama Columbus Distribution Center (53 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Yokohama Columbus Distribution Center has fewer employees than the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · OH · Columbus

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,500 employers in Columbus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 30235 - CAPSTONE KROGER MEMPHIS 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mercury Paper, Inc. - WDC1 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Dalton 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Joliet - 1151 East Laraway Road Suite 100 B2B-600 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Buckeye Lake, OH 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Layer Site 5 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE UTI Groveport 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canton Transmission SC 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital 13,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital Main Campus 10,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Methodist Hospital 9,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH1 5,057 FTE
NAT-TCR Tustin 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Livoak-B5510-Afh- Live Oak Store 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Se Reg-Waco 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Denver CO Yard 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE CS ElDorado 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint Mary's Park 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5410 - Runnemede 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5788 - Macomb 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.