Electric power generation, hydroelectric · California

Yuba County Water Agency

Marysville, CA · ~91 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Yuba County Water Agency runs at 247% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, hydroelectric workplace, earning a grade F.

Yuba County Water Agency: 3.0 TCR = 247% of Electric power generation, hydroelectric BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Yuba County Water Agency safety composite

Yuba County Water Agency scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2017→2024

Yuba County Water Agency injury rate improved

Yuba County Water Agency's TCR fell 4.2 from 5.2 in 2017 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.2 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221111 · Marysville, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.0 · 247% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO Iron Mountain Hydro
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Iron Mountain Hydro (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Yuba County Water Agency in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Yuba County Water Agency averages 3.0 TCR (247% of the Electric power generation, hydroelectric BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Yuba County Water Agency TCR series: 2017=5.2 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=1 · BLS 1.2

Where Yuba County Water Agency falls in its industry

129 Electric power generation, hyd establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Electric power generation, hyd employers in California.

Yuba County Water Agency (91 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Yuba County Water Agency
Yuba County Water Agency (91 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Yuba County Water Agency has more employees than the Electric power generation, hydroelectric median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 1.0 0 1 0
2023 2.2 1.1 2 0 0
2022 3.8 2.5 3 0 0
2021 2.2 0.0 1 1 0
2020 3.6 2.4 1 2 0
2019 1.4 0.0 0 1 0
2018 4.4 1.5 2 1 0
2017 5.2 1.7 1 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221111 · CA · Marysville

129 Electric power generation, hydroelectric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 39 employers in Marysville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Iron Mountain Hydro 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NYSEG Lancaster 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR RG&E Sodus 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Power Production 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE CDK Agriculture, Inc. 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Belridge 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Micro Paradox 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE CFS, LP. 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 64 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 583 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 619 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 57 2,054 FTE
NAT-TCR Camfil APC 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mondelez Global North East HDQ - Sales 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Marvin Lumber and Cedar Company - Minnesota 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant City FL Truss 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #0069 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Demmer Investments IV, Inc. dba Quality Tool (SD) 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Maine Maritime Academy 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE EPPA Mercy Hospital 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.