General accounting offices, government · Arizona

Yuma County Financial Services

Yuma, AZ · ~20 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Yuma County Financial Services runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General accounting offices, government workplace, earning a grade A.

Yuma County Financial Services: 0.8 TCR = 25% of General accounting offices, government BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Yuma County Financial Services safety composite

Yuma County Financial Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2016→2023

Yuma County Financial Services injury rate improved

Yuma County Financial Services's TCR fell 4.8 from 4.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Yuma, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/82
  • PHOTO Town Hall
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Town Hall (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Yuma County Financial Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Yuma County Financial Services averages 0.8 TCR (25% of the General accounting offices, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Yuma County Financial Services TCR series: 2016=4.8 · 2018=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Yuma County Financial Services falls in its industry

1,496 General accounting offices, go establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 82 General accounting offices, go employers in Arizona.

Yuma County Financial Services (20 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Yuma County Financial Services
Yuma County Financial Services (20 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Yuma County Financial Services has fewer employees than the General accounting offices, government median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · AZ · Yuma

1,496 General accounting offices, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 274 employers in Yuma, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Town Hall 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morton Grove Administration 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DeKalb City Hall 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maricopa County - Human Resources (310) 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE A. Oseguera Company 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Animal Nutrition Systems - ANS12 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Animal Nutrition Systems (Plant) - ANSP581 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tucson Corporate Office 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Primetime Harvesting Inc 2,271 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foothill Packing- Arizona 2,175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yuma Regional Medical Center 1,757 FTE
CITY-NEAR PGM PACKING INC 1,423 FTE
NAT-TCR CooperVision Manufacturing Puerto Rico LLC 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Grapevine Mills 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sycamore Labor Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Town Hall 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Swanson's Refrigeration & Restaurant Repair 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flow Control Industries, Inc 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stonelake Masonry, Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Berkeley Concrete Pumping 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.