Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building · Pennsylvania

Zartman

Northumberland, PA · ~96 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Zartman runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade D.

Zartman: 4.0 TCR = 138% of Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Zartman safety composite

Zartman scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2016→2021

Zartman injury rate improved

Zartman's TCR fell 3.9 from 5.7 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.7 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Northumberland, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 138% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #153/251
  • PHOTO Iconica
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Iconica (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Zartman in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Zartman averages 4.0 TCR (138% of the Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Zartman TCR series: 2016=5.7 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=1.8 · BLS 2.9

Where Zartman falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #153 safest of 251 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Pennsylvania.

Zartman (96 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Zartman
Zartman (96 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Zartman has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation gene median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.8 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.2 1.6 4 0 0
2018 6.2 4.6 8 0 0
2017 6.3 2.4 8 0 0
2016 5.7 0.9 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · PA · Northumberland

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 18 employers in Northumberland, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Iconica 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kopplow Construction Company, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR William H. Lane Inc 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Power Source Systems Inc. 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Longenecker's Hatchery, Inc. 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ardmore PA 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE G W Peoples Contracting Co., Inc. 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE CARSON CONCRETE CORPORATION 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR Leeds Health Care Services d.b.a. Nottingham Village 311 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nottingham Village 274 FTE
CITY-NEAR Strong Spas 262 FTE
CITY-NEAR Masonite Corp. - Northumberland 213 FTE
NAT-TCR Eagle Transport Corporation - Jacksonville 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Decker Precision Machining, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pallet Exchange Co., Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TS Tech TriMold 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marking Services Installation, Inc. 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE BT Cincinnati 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rosebud Village 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neosho 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.