Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · California

Zealigent Logistics Inc

Livermore, CA · ~47 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
11.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Zealigent Logistics Inc runs at 171% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade D.

Zealigent Logistics Inc: 11.1 TCR = 171% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Zealigent Logistics Inc safety composite

Zealigent Logistics Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 22.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Zealigent Logistics Inc: 0.0 → 22.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 22.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2.04× in 2024

Zealigent Logistics Inc's TCR rose 22.7 from 0.0 in 2022 to 22.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Livermore, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 11.1 · 171% of ind

  • DART 22.7 DART
  • RANK #393/710
  • PHOTO Fleet: Kansas City SDO
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fleet: Kansas City SDO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Zealigent Logistics Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Zealigent Logistics Inc averages 11.1 TCR (171% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Zealigent Logistics Inc TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=10.7 · 2024=22.7 · BLS 6.5

Where Zealigent Logistics Inc falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #393 safest of 710 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in California.

Zealigent Logistics Inc (47 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Zealigent Logistics Inc
Zealigent Logistics Inc (47 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Zealigent Logistics Inc has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 22.7 22.7 13 0 0
2023 10.7 8.6 5 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · CA · Livermore

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 296 employers in Livermore, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fleet: Kansas City SDO 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DOR1 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DOTHAN (ALDOT) 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR LUBBOCK CENTER (TXLUB) 11.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company,Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ruiz Farm Labor 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresh Valley Harvesting, LLC. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Solutions, LLC 4,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 577 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gillig LLC 940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fat Chance Entertainment 917 FTE
NAT-TCR GFL Environmental Grand Rapids Lowell 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Renewal - Redmond 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Willowbend Health & Rehabilitation 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR El Ahorro Supermarket #14, LLC 11.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE SB Charter Inc 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amaro Oilfield Construction, LLC 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - HDE2 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liberty Village DBA the Manor at Yorktown 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.