Commercial building rental or leasing · Wisconsin

Zilber Property Group

Milwaukee, WI · ~24 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Zilber Property Group runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commercial building rental or leasing workplace, earning a grade D.

Zilber Property Group: 1.8 TCR = 126% of Commercial building rental or leasing BLS 1.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Zilber Property Group safety composite

Zilber Property Group scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Zilber Property Group held a steady TCR band

Zilber Property Group's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=9.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=5.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531120 · Milwaukee, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.8 · 126% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO High Associates Ltd.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: High Associates Ltd. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Zilber Property Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Zilber Property Group averages 1.8 TCR (126% of the Commercial building rental or leasing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Zilber Property Group TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=9 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=5.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.4

Where Zilber Property Group falls in its industry

302 Commercial building rental or establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Commercial building rental or employers in Wisconsin.

Zilber Property Group (24 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Zilber Property Group
Zilber Property Group (24 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Zilber Property Group has fewer employees than the Commercial building rental or leasing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 9.0 4.5 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531120 · WI · Milwaukee

302 Commercial building rental or leasing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 980 employers in Milwaukee, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR High Associates Ltd. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4747 Portland 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northshore Mall 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4654 Salt Lake City 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Huntsinger Farms, Inc. 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weiss Family Farms, Incorporated 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Omro Dairy, LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pilgrim's Hatchery 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center 7,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR FROEDTERT HOSPITAL 7,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milwaukee Hospital 3,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Childrens Hospital - Milw Campus 2,851 FTE
NAT-TCR MNC Garage/Fleet 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR MH Evansville 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Home Office 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fujifilm Electronic Materials U.S.A., Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE IHG Army Hotels - Fort Campbell (Holiday Inn Express) 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nu Way Concrete Forms Wentzville, LLC 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mainline 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jamestown CSC 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.