Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · North Dakota

Jamestown CSC

Jamestown, ND · ~24 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jamestown CSC runs at 225% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

Jamestown CSC: 2.7 TCR = 225% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jamestown CSC safety composite

Jamestown CSC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.7

2016→2024

Jamestown CSC injury rate improved

Jamestown CSC's TCR fell 11.7 from 11.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 11.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Jamestown, ND ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.7 · 225% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/13
  • PHOTO 00714 CASPER CUST SV…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 00714 CASPER CUST SVC CNTR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Jamestown CSC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jamestown CSC averages 2.7 TCR (225% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jamestown CSC TCR series: 2016=11.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Jamestown CSC falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 13 Electric power generation, fos employers in North Dakota.

Jamestown CSC (24 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Jamestown CSC
Jamestown CSC (24 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Jamestown CSC has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2019 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2018 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 11.7 3.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · ND · Jamestown

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 39 employers in Jamestown, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 00714 CASPER CUST SVC CNTR 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vectren Corporation - AB Brown 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trinity Valley Electric Cooperative 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chugach Electric 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eagle Operating Inc 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Substation & Communications 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4T Construction 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valor Contracting LLC 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodrich Corporation (Jamestown ND) 527 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodrich - Cargo Systems 490 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jamestown Regional Medical Center 310 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1649 268 FTE
NAT-TCR Glendale 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR RAUMEDIC Inc. Mills River, NC 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Zephyr Aluminum, LLC - Baltimore 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Shelton City Hall 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nu Way Concrete Forms Wentzville, LLC 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stoughton Office 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE IHG Army Hotels - Fort Campbell (Holiday Inn Express) 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zilber Property Group 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.