Radio frequency identification (RFID) devices manufacturing · Washington

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Headquarters

Seattle, WA · ~220 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Headquarters runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Radio frequency identification (RFID) devices manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Headquarters: 0.3 TCR = 10% of Radio frequency identification (RFID) devices manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Headquarters safety composite

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Headquarters scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2017

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Headquarters injury rate improved

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Headquarters's TCR fell 0.6 from 0.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.6 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.6 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334419 · Seattle, WA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 10% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO JADAK
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~220 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JADAK (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Headquarters in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Zonar Systems, Inc. - Headquarters averages 0.3 TCR (10% of the Radio frequency identification (RFID) devices manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Headquarters TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2017=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Zonar Systems, Inc. - Headquarters falls in its industry

334 Radio frequency identification establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Radio frequency identification employers in Washington.

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Headquarters (220 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Zonar Systems, Inc. - Headquarters
Zonar Systems, Inc. - Headquarters (220 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8

Zonar Systems, Inc. - Headquarters has more employees than the Radio frequency identification (RFID) de median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334419 · WA · Seattle

334 Radio frequency identification (RFID) devices manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JADAK 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phoenix - 4050 East Cotton Center Boulevard 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bourns, Inc. - Riverside, CA 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smartrac Technology Fletcher Inc. 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Power Production 220 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mariner Construction 220 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Mirror 220 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alliance Machine Systems International LLC 220 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR Pewaukee - Marianos 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Oldcastle OPI - Napoleon 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bombardier Transportation - Pittsburgh - LCS 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodrich Aerostructures 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Grid Solutions : AIS - USC - Charleroi, PA, USA 220 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pleasantville (Njple) 220 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orange Avenue (Flora) 220 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bremen Castings, Inc., - Foundry @ 500 N. Baltimore 220 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.