Other Residential Care Facilities · California

ZSFGH Behavioral Health Center

San Francisco, CA · ~138 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ZSFGH Behavioral Health Center runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Other Residential Care Facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

ZSFGH Behavioral Health Center: 4.9 TCR = 128% of Other Residential Care Facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ZSFGH Behavioral Health Center safety composite

ZSFGH Behavioral Health Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ZSFGH Behavioral Health Center: 5.6 → 6.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.43× in 2024

ZSFGH Behavioral Health Center's TCR rose 1.4 from 5.6 in 2017 to 6.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 128% of ind

  • DART 6.9 DART
  • RANK #33/91
  • PHOTO Youth Villas
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~138 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Youth Villas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

ZSFGH Behavioral Health Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ZSFGH Behavioral Health Center averages 4.9 TCR (128% of the Other Residential Care Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ZSFGH Behavioral Health Center TCR series: 2017=5.6 · 2018=6.3 · 2020=4.9 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=6.9 · BLS 3.8

Where ZSFGH Behavioral Health Center falls in its industry

560 Other Residential Care Facilit establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 91 Other Residential Care Facilit employers in California.

ZSFGH Behavioral Health Center (138 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate ZSFGH Behavioral Health Center
ZSFGH Behavioral Health Center (138 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

ZSFGH Behavioral Health Center has more employees than the Other Residential Care Facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.9 6.9 7 3 0
2023 4.2 2.8 3 3 0
2022 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2021 5.6 4.9 7 1 0
2020 4.9 4.9 7 0 0
2018 6.3 4.9 7 2 0
2017 5.6 3.5 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · CA · San Francisco

560 Other Residential Care Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Youth Villas 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-554319 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Potrero Hill Health Center 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 482291 NJ 8008 US ROUTE 130 N 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Westerlay Orchids LP 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Danell Custom Harvesting LLC - DCH629 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sustainable Labor Solutions, Inc 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE RLH Fire Protection 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Arlington Heights School District 25 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hoover Treated Wood Products - Thomson 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Neopod Systems 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Shea Properties-TCM 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Service Uniform Englewood Colorado 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Professional Airlines Services , Inc. 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE GKN Aerospace Engine Systems, Newington 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baltimore 029 138 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.